About the Journal
All content published in STREDOEVROPSKY VESTNIK PRO VEDU A VYZKUM is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, as well as use them for any other lawful purpose without prior permission from the publisher or author.
REVIEW POLICY:
Review Type:
"STREDOEVROPSKY VESTNIK PRO VEDU A VYZKUM uses Double-Blind Peer Review. This means that the author's personal data is hidden from the reviewers, and the reviewers' data is hidden from the authors throughout the process."
Initial Screening:
"All submitted articles undergo an initial review by the editorial board for compliance with the journal profile, relevance, quality of design, and absence of plagiarism (using StrikePlagiarism software."
Reviewer Selection:
"The editor or a member of the Editorial Board selects at least two independent external reviewers who are recognized experts in the relevant field."
Timelines:
"The standard review period is 4-6 weeks."
Decision:
Accept without changes.
Accept with minor corrections.
Accept with significant corrections (repeated review required).
Reject.
Final decision:
"The final decision on publication is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the reviewers' recommendations and the scientific value of the work."
Archiving
The PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN) is used to archive the journal and its articles.
Ethics and Prevention of Dishonesty Policy
STREDOEVROPSKY VESTNIK PRO VEDU A VYZKUM adheres to the highest standards of publication ethics and is guided by the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Our policy is based on the principles:
Authors: Are obliged to provide accurate research results, cite all sources used, and disclose any conflicts of interest.
Reviewers: Are obliged to maintain confidentiality, objectively assess the quality of the work, and indicate any possible conflicts of interest.
Editorial Board: Is responsible for making decisions solely on the basis of scientific merit and is obliged to consider all cases of dishonor, including plagiarism, data fabrication, and incorrect authorship, in accordance with the COPE guidelines (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/guidelines).
Plagiarism Checking: All submitted manuscripts are checked using StrikePlagiarism.