MULTI-CONTOUR PROFILE-MATRIX DIAGNOSTICS OF THE ECONOMIC RESILIENCE OF FREIGHT ROAD TRANSPORT ENTERPRISES UNDER HIGH-TECH TRANSFORMATION

Анотація

The article substantiates a multi-contour profile-matrix methodology for diagnosing the economic resilience of freight road transport enterprises under high-tech transformation. The approach is based on the premise that resilience cannot be reliably represented by a single integral score because strong values in one domain may conceal critical vulnerabilities in another. The proposed methodology combines five autonomous diagnostic profiles: financial-economic, operational-market, resource-technical, innovation-technological, and risk-recovery. It integrates verified data provenance, threshold zoning, dynamic indicators of resistance and recovery, cluster typology and panel modelling. A two-level information design is proposed, combining a broad panel based on official registration and financial data with an in-depth subsample containing operational and technological indicators. Four diagnostic zones—critical, vulnerable, acceptable and resilient—are used without compensatory aggregation across profiles. The methodology also distinguishes the depth of functional decline, recovery time, completeness of recovery and cumulative loss of functionality. Its practical value lies in preserving causal traceability from an observed deviation to the underlying vulnerability and in creating a direct analytical transition from diagnosis to differentiated managerial measures, scenario trajectories and investment decisions.

REFERENCES

1. Hillmann J., Guenther E. Organizational Resilience: A Valuable Construct for Management Research? International Journal of Management Reviews. 2021. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 7–44.

2. Duchek S. Organizational Resilience: A Capability-Based Conceptualization. Business Research. 2020. Vol. 13. P. 215–246.

3. Pettit T. J., Fiksel J., Croxton K. L. Ensuring Supply Chain Resilience: Development of a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Business Logistics. 2010. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 1–21.

4. Ponomarov S. Y., Holcomb M. C. Understanding the Concept of Supply Chain Resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management. 2009. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 124–143.

5. Bruneau M., Chang S. E., Eguchi R. T. et al. A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities. Earthquake Spectra. 2003. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 733–752.

6. ISO 22316:2017. Security and Resilience — Organizational Resilience — Principles and Attributes.

7. ISO 31000:2018. Risk Management — Guidelines.

8. IEC 31010:2019. Risk Management — Risk Assessment Techniques.

9. OECD, European Union, Joint Research Centre. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008.

10. Cochran W. G. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1977.

11. Lohr S. L. Sampling: Design and Analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2021.

12. Little R. J. A., Rubin D. B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2019.

13. Ward J. H. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1963. Vol. 58. No. 301. P. 236–244.

14. Rousseeuw P. J. Silhouettes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 1987. Vol. 20. P. 53–65.

15. Wooldridge J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.