THE ACTIVITY-BASED ASPECT OF TRAINING STUDENTS IN TECHNICAL SPECIALTIES

Автор(и)

  • Oksana Savielieva Автор
  • Andrii Savieliev Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65237/2336-3630-2026-9(1)-7

Ключові слова:

activity-based approach, master’s students in technical specialties, methods of teaching professional disciplines, pedagogical activity, active learning, professional training

Анотація

The article examines the activity-based approach to studying the discipline “Methods of Teaching Professional Disciplines” by students majoring in technical specialties. The relevance of shifting the focus from an information-explanatory model of teaching to students’ active engagement in learning activities aimed at the practical application of methodological knowledge is substantiated. The purpose of the study is to provide a theoretical justification for the activity-based approach to studying the discipline and to identify the specific features of its implementation in developing future specialists’ readiness to organize professionally oriented learning activities.

Based on an analysis of recent studies on the pedagogical training of engineering professionals, the need to combine subject-specific and pedagogical components of professional training is established. The study reveals the specific features of students’ active engagement in learning through a combination of mini-lectures and practical tasks, independent development of test items, design and delivery of fragments of learning sessions, peer assessment, and reflection. The process of activity-based learning of the discipline is proposed to be viewed as a sequential cycle: comprehension of theoretical material, performance of a practical task, creation of an individual learning product, its implementation, peer assessment, reflection, and adjustment of activities. It is established that such an organization of learning facilitates the transition from acquiring methodological knowledge to gaining experience in its practical application and developing future specialists’ ability to independently design, implement, and evaluate the learning activities of students in professionally oriented educational contexts. Further research should focus on identifying criteria for assessing the development of such readiness and experimentally verifying the effectiveness of the activity-based organization of learning the discipline.

References

1.      Chen, J., Du, X., Jiang, D., Guerra, A. O. P. de C., & Nørgaard, B. (2024). A review study with a systematic approach: Pedagogical development for educators in higher engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(2), 299–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2290032

2.      Fong, C. J., Gilmore, J., Pinder-Grover, T., & Hatcher, M. (2019). Examining the impact of four teaching development programmes for engineering teaching assistants. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(3), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1361517

3.      Liu, D. (2022). The factors of enhancing graduate teaching assistants’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) performance in engineering curriculum teaching. Discover Education, 1, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-022-00017-8

4.      Lysenko, H. I. (2018). Psychological and pedagogical aspects of professional training of masters of technic profile. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 1(7), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.31339/2413-3329-2018-1(7)-107-110

5.      Lysenko, H. I. (2020). Педагогіка вищої школи в системі професійної підготовки магістрів технічного профілю. Український педагогічний журнал, (4), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2020-4-150-160

6.      Schram, L. N., Pinder-Grover, T., & Turcic, S., II. (2017). Assessing the long-term impact of the Preparing Future Faculty Seminar. To Improve the Academy, 36(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20063

7.      Shehab, S., Katz, J. E., Kirby, E., Pool, M., Chen, Y. W., & Johnson, B. E. (2023). The impact of a 16-week preparation course on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of graduate teaching assistants in engineering. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--44456

Біографії авторів

  • Oksana Savielieva

    Doctor of Technical Sciences, professor, Department

    Department of Dynamics, Machines Strength and Material Resistance,

    Odesa National Polytechnic University, Odesa, Ukraine,

    https//orcid.org/0000-0002-0453-4777

  • Andrii Savieliev

    Candidate of Science in Engineering, Linguodidactics department, Odesa National Polytechnic University, Odesa, Ukraine, https//orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-9931

Завантаження

Опубліковано

2026-09-04

Номер

Розділ

Статті