THE CURRENT STATE AND PROBLEMS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RESEARCH

Authors

  • Ihor Khmyrov Автор
  • Valerii Bosniuk Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65237/2336-3630-2026-3(2)-2

Keywords:

intellectual property, legal regulation, protection and enforcement, international regulation, theoretical and legal research

Abstract

The article examines the current state and the main challenges in the scientific study of intellectual property as a legal, socio-cultural, and economic phenomenon. The study analyzes domestic and foreign scholarly works that address both theoretical and practical aspects of intellectual property, including its legal regulation, protection and enforcement of rights, as well as its role in the development of society and public policy. It is established that in national scholarship the issues of intellectual property have been studied quite extensively; however, most studies are cumulative and fragmented in nature and are characterized by a lack of systematicity, consistency, and conceptual integrity.

The analysis of the available research makes it possible to identify several key directions in the development of scientific studies on intellectual property, including historical-legal, theoretical-legal, socio-cultural, and practice-oriented approaches. In particular, attention is paid to the study of intellectual property as a social value for both society and the individual, as well as to its manifestations in the behavioral culture of legal subjects, in state policy, and in international legal regulation. The paper considers the significant contributions of researchers who have analyzed the historical formation of the institution of intellectual property, the social and cultural prerequisites for its development, as well as practical mechanisms of legal regulation and judicial practice related to the protection of intellectual property rights.

Special attention is paid to the influence of globalization on the legal protection of intellectual property, the relationship between international standards and national legislation, and the need to unify approaches and standardize mechanisms for the protection of intellectual property rights. The author emphasizes that contemporary studies in this field generally have a narrow subject focus and only occasionally combine theoretical and practical perspectives, which necessitates further conceptualization of research and the development of a systematic approach to the study of intellectual property.

The article outlines prospects for the further development of scientific research in the field of intellectual property and highlights the importance of combining methodological approaches and conducting a comprehensive analysis of its legal, socio-cultural, and economic dimensions.

References

1.      Holovkova, O. M. (2008). Genesis of legal protection of intellectual property. Forum Prava, (1), 92–98.

2.      Virchenko, V. V. (2013). The history of the development of theoretical ideas about the content and sources of intellectual property law. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 146, 15–18.

3.      Seniuta, V. O. (2017). The birth of intellectual property law: the Venetian phenomenon. Law and Society, (3), 79–82.

4.      Seniuta, V. O. (2017). On the history of the formation of patent law. In Current Issues of Legal Regulation in the Context of Globalization: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Dnipro, March 10, 2017) (pp. 19–21). Dnipro: Law, Justice and Civil Society.

5.      Kuzniakova, T. V. (2015). State policy in the field of intellectual property: history of formation and international experience. Problems of Engineering and Pedagogical Education, 48, 80–90.

6.      Khan, B. Z., & Sokoloff, K. L. (2001). The early development of intellectual property institutions in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 233–246.

7.      Hemmungs Wirtén, E. (2004). No Trespassing: Authorship, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Boundaries of Globalization. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.

8.      Buinicki, M. (2006). Negotiating Copyright: Authorship and the Discourse of Literary Property Rights in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Routledge.

9.      Manz, W. H. (Ed.). (2009). Protecting America’s Intellectual Property: A Legislative History of the Pro IP Act of 2008. New York: Manz.

10.  Salter, B. (2022). Negotiating Copyright in the American Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.  McGinnis, R. (Ed.). (2009). Originality and Intellectual Property in the French and English Enlightenment. New York: Routledge.

12.  Wirtén, E. H. (2015). Making Marie Curie: Intellectual Property and Celebrity Culture in an Age of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

13.  Willinsky, J. (2018). The Intellectual Properties of Learning: A Prehistory from Saint Jerome to John Locke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14.  Bracha, O. (2016). Owning Ideas: The Intellectual Origins of American Intellectual Property. New York: Cambridge University Press.

15.  Kenney, M. (2017). Comment upon history and the debate over intellectual property. Management and Organization Review, 13(1), 49–56.

16.  Tawfik, M. (2023). For the Encouragement of Learning: The Origins of Canadian Copyright Law. Cambridge: University of Toronto Press.

17.  McLeod, K. (2001). Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law. New York: P. Lang.

18.  Hansen, H. C. (Ed.). (2010). Intellectual Property Law and Policy (Vol. 11). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

19.  Wong, Tz. (2010). Intellectual property through the lens of human development. В T. Wong & G. Dutfield (Eds.), Intellectual Property and Human Development: Current Trends and Future Scenarios (pp. 1–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.  Dinwoodie, G. (Ed.). (2013). Methods and Perspectives in Intellectual Property. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.

21.  Bellido, J. (Ed.). (2017). Landmark Cases in Intellectual Property Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

22.  Heath, C., & Kamperman Sanders, A. (Eds.). (2019). Intellectual Property and International Dispute Resolution. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law International.

23.  Morris, P. S. (Ed.). (2022). Intellectual Property and the Law of Nations. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.

24.  Heath, C. (2003). Intellectual Property Law in Asia. London: Kluwer Law International.

25.  Goldstein, P., & Straus, J. (Eds.). (2009). Intellectual Property in Asia: Law, Economics, History and Politics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

26.  Dutfield, G. (2016). Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries: A Twentieth Century History. London: Routledge.

27.  Falce, V. (2014). Intellectual Property Law in Italy. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

28.  Bouche, N. (2017). Intellectual Property Law in France. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

Author Biographies

  • Ihor Khmyrov

    Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Management in the Field of Civil Protection, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, Cherkasy, Ukraine, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7958-463X

  • Valerii Bosniuk

    PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the Department of Psychology of Activity in Special Conditions, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine, Cherkasy, Ukraine, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0141-1920

Downloads

Published

2026-03-21

Issue

Section

Статті